Scientists caution that believing that the pandemic is finished is a dream based on incomplete information.
Scientists have lately been investigating the 1889 Russian flu pandemic in order to gain insight into how the current COVID-19 pandemic might evolve. They suspect that the present pandemic is driven by a coronavirus rather than the influenza virus.

How long do you think the pandemic will last? Nobody is aware of it. Although the number of coronavirus infections is decreasing, experts warn that it is premature to conclude that the pandemic has ended.

As a result of the recent decline in the number of cases, the pandemic period is likely to begin, which can be described as "containment of the virus, but" it is not the same as the end of the pandemic, "wrote Dr. Eric Topol, a professor of molecular medicine at the Strips Institute in San Diego, in a February article for the Los Angeles Times.

In Topol's opinion, when statesmen say that we just need to continue living with the virus and lift all restrictions, people mistakenly interpret this as a sign that the pandemic is over - forever. He goes on to say that such thinking is mere fantasy because it is possible that we will be fighting the virus for months to come. as well as years

What we can learn from history
Pandemics have been known to last for several years in the past, as demonstrated by recent history.

According to John Barry, author of "The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History," the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic lasted three years, and its fourth wave in 1920 was more deadly for some American cities than the more famous second wave in 1918, according to the author of "The Great Influenza."

Scientists have lately been investigating the 1889 Russian flu pandemic in order to gain insight into how the current COVID-19 pandemic might evolve. They suspect that the present pandemic is driven by a coronavirus rather than the influenza virus.

Between these two pandemics, there are some striking similarities. The Russian epidemic initially erupted in what is now Uzbekistan in the spring of 1889, and it has spread ever since. According to epidemiologist Dr. George Rutherford of the University of California, San Francisco, the virus has spread over the world in three waves over the course of three years.

"The Russian flu only affects the elderly," Rutherford continued, pointing out that influenza is unique in that it is most severe in the very young and elderly population. 19.

Scientist Harald Brüssow released a comprehensive analysis in the journal Microbial Biotechnology in March of this year stating that it is likely that the time of increasing CIVUD-19-related fatalities will extend for more than five years.

The pandemic of 1889 in England and Wales began a year later and had resulted in a substantial number of deaths by the end of the year. After then, the number of deaths decreased, but "it remained much greater than it had been before the epidemic," according to the CDC.

It can be observed from these data that this pandemic, which is comparable to the COVID-19 disease pandemic, continued for five years, indicating that COVID-19 will continue to afflict us beyond 2022 if vaccine programs do not alter the "natural" path of the virus. It is not yet apparent if the course of events in this pandemic will be similar to that of 140 years ago, wrote Brüssow, who went on to say that "it is not yet evident whether the course of events in this pandemic will be similar to that of 140 years ago."

We must point out the major distinctions between the Russian flu pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. The Russian flu pandemic was characterized by widespread illness and death. For the period of the 'Russian,' masks were worn less frequently, quarantine procedures were unusual, and vaccinations were not readily available.

Prepare yourself for the worst-case situation.
According to Topol, there is still a risk that the virus will mutate, become more harmful, and circumvent the protection that has been built up through vaccination and illness.

That is why it is critical to be prepared for the worst-case scenario; we must monitor any new increases in the number of infected, monitor the virus in wastewater, enhance ventilation systems, and develop a vaccine that is effective against all forms of the virus, according to Topol's article.

It is critical to continue immunization in order to prevent the creation of new, modified variants as a result of the possibility of new variants.

As Topol points out, there are billions of unvaccinated people in the globe who have no protection against viruses they have had in the past. When the virus is not regulated, as is the case at the moment, the likelihood of new varieties rising increases exponentially.

BA.2, a subtype of the omicron variation, is still under investigation by experts.

Rutherford contends that subtype A.2 is more easily transmitted than the predominant subtype BA.1, and that there have been cases of it causing more severe symptoms than BA.1.

However, BA.2 is only responsible for a small percentage of all cases over the world, according to statistics.

BA.2 does not appear to be developing into a significant threat at this time, but we should not be shocked if another variant appears in the future months that will be deserving of its own Greek letter, according to Topol.